when looking on the racing channel toteboards, the horses whose odds get shorter as the money pours in, usually finish in the top 3.
is this an abberition? is it common sense? seems the way to bet is to follow the money.
i realize i could be all wet here and am not viewing a large sample size. but, time and time again i've seen a horse thats like 12:1 got to 4:1 and finish in the top 3. never seems to go the other way (horse that starts 2:1 and ends 5:1 usually finishes out of the money).
comments please.
is this an abberition? is it common sense? seems the way to bet is to follow the money.
i realize i could be all wet here and am not viewing a large sample size. but, time and time again i've seen a horse thats like 12:1 got to 4:1 and finish in the top 3. never seems to go the other way (horse that starts 2:1 and ends 5:1 usually finishes out of the money).
comments please.